This is a letter that I sent to The Blackshear Times. My understanding it is in this week's paper, but I haven't seen the paper to fully verify that.
The version they have may be edited from this, which is their right.
Editor, The Times
I love our
public library. The staff is excellent, the community programs offered are
great, and serve people with a wide variety of interests, including special
displays for Black History Month, Women’s History Month, and Sexual Abuse
Awareness Month. In addition, they can help you access books not only at the
library but from other libraries. They have DVDs, audiobooks, and even an
E-reader app.
The library
is a public space. It is open and inclusive of everyone. Every. Single. Person.
It is one place where wealth doesn’t matter – everyone is served equally. It
respects and serves the diversity of religions of this area, including the many
denominations of Christianity. It is open to all people, of all races and
creeds, and, yes, of different sexual orientations.
One thing
you are not free to do is try to exclude and discriminate. You may have as a
tenant of your faith that leads you to condemn LGBTQ+ people. That’s
discouraging, but it is your right to attend church and dwell in other private
spaces where that belief is held. You cannot take that belief into a public
space and exclude and make any group unwelcome for any reason.
To demonize
a group simply because of who they are physically attracted to is wrong. To
accuse that the mere mention of physical attraction is improper is also wrong.
Physical attraction in and of itself is not sexualizing, as many who would like
to exclude the LGBTQ+ would say.
If a woman
is physically attracted to a man, does that mean she is sexualizing? She has the
right to find books that feature heterosexual romance. To what degree that
romance is physicalized may depend on the book’s age category, which librarians
help regulate. Girls may want to read about princesses being rescued by
princes, and adult women may want to read, uh, more assertive material. Those
attracted to the same sex should also be able to find age-appropriate material.
To be gay is no more sexualizing than to be straight. To see a picture of two
Dads with their children is no more sexualizing than to see a man and a woman
with their children.
A better
example of sexualizing may be when very young girls are put in skimpy costumes
and adult makeup to compete in beauty pageants or dance recitals.
Every parent
has a right to be concerned about sexual predators. Statistically, they need to
look closer to home, sometimes family members, but most often friends of the
family, people in a position to gain access and trust. Coaches, youth pastors,
preachers, and teachers are often in roles that predators use to acquire the
“In” they need.
Does this
mean you should avoid youth pastors, coaches, etc.? No. Many are safe and
positive mentors. To blanketly condemn a whole group for the actions of a few
is wrong. You must use caution. But you must not condemn entire groups. That
leads only to bigotry and hate.
Some groups
in our community are vilified, mistreated, marginalized, and excluded. That
should not be true at our public library.
I don’t
think displaying something for Pride Month is asking too much. I don’t believe
the inclusion of a rainbow flag or rainbow symbolism is asking too much. It is
never too much to extend the hand of kindness, inclusion, and love.
Everyone
counts in the rainbow of diversity that is our open public Library—every single
person.
A local
organization that is fighting against censorship, book bans, and discrimination
is the Okefenokee Library Alliance. They can be found on social media,
including Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. If you stand for public libraries
that are open and accessible to all, please check it out and consider joining.
Everyone has
an equal right to the library’s resources. But no one has the right to base
their participation on excluding other people – the people themselves, their
books, their clubs, or their displays. Because the Library is for everyone.
Every.
Single. Person.
Tom Strait
I wish they would have edited the letter across from yours....that was awful.
ReplyDeleteI still haven't seen the paper yet. They published their viewpoint last week - I guess it's going to be in every week.
DeleteIt was a rather ugly letter from an ugly hearted person :(
ReplyDelete